HITMAN: A REVIEW
This film stars a young actor named Timothy Olyphant. Although his character is a veritable killing machine, he, nevertheless, is the protagonist and the closest thing the film has to an admirable hero. Why? Cherchez la femme!
I would definitely classify this film as a male film, as it is overwhelmingly involved in fighting. This happens to be just about fantasy number one amongst adolescent males, that is , “The Conguering Hero.” Male kids believe that all things that are good come to such heros, so why seek to be anything else? Since most men fight a long but losing battle with nature’s nudges to “grow up,” the fantasy lives on well past boyhood. It can even inform “global strategy.” For those men who fight nature most fiercely, they take their “conquering hero” fantasy to the grave.
This film also involves spies, intelligence, global gun-dealing, political body doubles,crime syndicates, international police, hightech, athleticism and the like. All of these are male draws and, when bundled, advance the percentage better than merely geometrically.
The fighting scenes weren’t stinted. They involved various weapons. Some scenes involved use of two or more weapons. There were sapper rifles and various explosives. You get the picture–Male Stuff.
The film had enough humor to cause me to laugh aloud. Not everyone else at the theatre I attended (5:10 pm, Wed.) did. Few there were. I laughed alone. I’m that kind of guy. In this film we have baldheaded assassins with sales-code type tattoos on the back of their heads going unnoticed ["Doesn't everyone have a tattoo, now?"]. There exists an “Association” which is composed of assassins who “hire out” to governments to eliminate “problems” but whose organizational structure and leadership are totally unknown to INTERPOL, etc., [their payoffs are to banks located in some nation or other]. Is this not absurdists fare? There is also a droll “C.I.A.” intrusion into an INTERPOL arrest inside Russia late in the flick.
One of the surprising little discoveries about this film is that the script had some very, very clever colloquies. The best of these were between a new (to me) actress named Olga Kurylewska (?) and Timothy Olyphant. Besides liking her “looks,” she was a scene-stealing presence. The director had the sense to “work” this asset. She is really the only female that has any significant film time, but she makes sure her sex’s film moments are well-remembered. She has an engaging, attractive, charming way. Oh! Did I mention that she plays a prostitute? However, Olga is a Russian “girl-next-door” who has been away on a world tour “being footloose and body free,” so to speak.
Her problems are three: she is considered a chattel slave; she is forced to provide sexual services, generally for money; and finally, powerful governmental authorities intend to kill her. What does a cute, clever Russian girl do under these circumstances? For her to hope to be saved by a suddenly appearing Murdering Machine probably was not her first thought. It’s dumb luck! Hollywood’s deus ex machina comes to the rescue in the person of–of–well, #47.
The film opens with an ethereal “slideshow” of baldheaded images from babes to teen-boys to monks, wedded to a suitable soundtrack. The purpose of this preamble is to suggest a monklike order, dedicated to certain principles, such as: The Order is supreme, the kill must be perfect, the assignment voluntary, and the loot for the job in the bank account. The preamble progresses to a grainy, news-documentary style depicting of the training of globally-rejected children who are deemed likely “fits” for Association Assassin. All this is meant to make creditable the extraordinary danger created by #47, aka, “our man,” “shadow,” “ghost,” etc.
There is postulated to the moviegoer the existence of a faintly visible, international association of assassins who form ad hoc “working relationships” with governments [& large corporations?] to “get rid of problems.” This narrator is a high official of INTERPOL, which seems to be based in The Hague. He has a constant companion to aid him, who appears to be of West African origin. This narrator is constantly smoking cigarettes (and he’s not the only one), suggesting tobacco industry financing may be involved. By his accent the moviegoer takes him to be HRM’s representative to INTERPOL. The moviegoer hears the usual references to some article or other of international law. The purpose seems to try to send this fantasy trip off in a realistic way, so that no one will suddenly blurt out: “It’s only a paper moon!”
“Our” INTERPOL man is shown in action with his crew, as a local war-lord is about to be “de-problemed.” Setting: Central Africa? Assassination rating: AAA+. INTERPOL relationship with local authorities is, as seems to be typical, not so good. Hence, they don’t believe in “the shadow” nor “the Association.” Result: Another success for #47 and the Association.
This narrator/INTERPOL chieftain worries “big time” about “our guy” (the shadow). He an his sidekick sweat the big drops about this dude. So, who is he?
He’s Timothy Olyphant. This is not anyone’s notion of a Killing Machine. He doesn’t look all that big, for one. I’m not talking Shaq-big or Hulk-big. When the moviegoer sees him next to Olga, he seems only marginally bigger. Still, Olyphant plays the role with a Calvin Coolidge-like economy of words [credit the scriptwriter here], a striking coldness, credible athleticism, and a sort of implacable quality that might well scare most anyone. HE IS A STONE COLD KILLER–TRAINED FROM BOYHOOD. He rarely expresses much facially, other than what must be obliged under extreme exertion. And that’s not his way. He doesn’t like to give a victim “extreme exertion.”
The storyline: Star (#47) of international assassination organization, notching at least his hundreth kill, is free to take an assignment to assassinate the head of Russia, Comrade Mr. Belikov. Agreeing to deed, he does. Preparing to leave, he’s advised of “witness” and the need to to eliminate this witness. He agrees. The Return initiates the moviegoer to a plot wrinkle, political doubles, brothers, other assassins, jurisdictional conflicts between National agencies and INTERPOL, and not least, the intriguing Olga, who brings into this film almost all the fun and humor there is to be found. Incredibly, #47, having nearly assassinated her, shang-hais her, uses her as lure, keeps her as assistant, he finds that his cold has chilled a bit, due to her wondrous influence. At last sunshine! He makes the decision to carry forward to an end which will mean a good ending for Olga. And, all’s well that’s Olga’s well.
This movie is related by means of a “flashback,” generated when #47 surprises the Narrator one night at the INTERPOL chieftains home. The chief is asked a question by #47. “Should a good man ever kill?” The mass of the movie transpires. Then the moviegoer resurfaces at this very point for the Narrator’s answer. Some folks want to be left alone; others feel obliged to bother someone. Can there be a modus vivendi?
There is an epilog. The moviegoer sees that Olga’s well and watched over [wonder who? hmmmmmn].
Anything else? This is a movie that ends where the imagination decides it should. I see sunshine. What about you?
All rights reserved. Gobigfoot, 2007.
