HINTS AND CLUES IN ART

The Emperor Walks Down The Street Proudly Showing Off His New Clothes.

For many people literature is just a fraud. Neither people nor events actually occur. It’s “make-believe” and fit only for toddlers. The people who populate the literary scene are often, it seems, aware of the mess their peers have made, and they try to get around this problem by “gimmicks,” such as “the nonfiction novel.” In modern times no one would assume that a literary figure was interested in the public good. Certainly, they–in time–can be counted upon to “join the marches” to protest “injustices,” it is always for the few–not the many. Why? The powerful ruling circles use “the few” as ramming instruments to batter down the gates of the “city of the many”–the better to loot, maim and pillage. The many rarely perceive the words “bloody revolution”–even when it is shouted at them and lettered placards are waved in their faces. The general view is: it will all blow over in time. At any rate sheep are not so smart.

In days gone by, there were famous literary figures who tried to warn their wide readership of the danger in their midst. Strangely, none understood the danger, even when they correctly identified the targets. Today, there are no mentions of these literary clues and hints among academia. Education has been co-opted, and the Rule of Material Omissions prevails.

Let’s observe two 19th century writers and the warnings they expressed to their readers by means of literary characters. Firstly, let’s briefly consider Mr. Charles Dickens.

In his famous book David Copperfield  Dickens included a period in David’s early manhood in which he had “eyes for” the sweet young daughter of a prosperous figure in the business area of rents and other money matters. This man employed a clerk, named Uriah Heep, whose personal mannerisms were obsequious, oleaginous and characterized by false modesty. He tried to seem to be “Mr. Nice Guy” at this counting house. He declared himself to be of modest situation, almost begging for sympathy. He was certainly not worthy of his boss’s daughter’s hand, he indicated. Yet, quietly he was buying up his boss’s debt instruments. Finally, the day came when he had papers sufficient to claim ownership of the house of his former boss, who he was willing to keep on as a clerk. He demanded the boss’s daughter in marriage, not because he loved her, but to degrade the once “high-and-mighty” family by union with such a modest fellow as he. This plot was undone by David Copperfield before the woman he loved was lost. He also restore the father to his former position–now wiser in the ways of the world.

In this small section of Dickens’ lengthy novel, he was warning his fellow Englishmen of the danger of the Jews in England. It was actually prophetic, as Jews did gain control of England, as did their literary “stand-in,” Uriah Heep. The “take-over” commenced in the dawn of the modern era when the Bank of England was established, which allowed its principals to loan money, which was uncollateralized by anything other than the right to tax the labor of workers. This began to initiate a vastly increasing debt and tax level in England through the years of its operation. Guess who came to control the debt? Guess who used this leverage to influence policies in ways that also increased their power? The ruling circles of Jews, who had also begun the process of marrying into the aristocracy, had gained control. Edom had broken his brother’s ( Jacob-Israel’s) bonds, and was plotting to slouch back to Jerusalem to be born.

Over time, all of the nonJewish Elites of England were characterized by Godlessness and corruption. World Wars I & II largely eliminated the virtuous masculine remnant from England, leaving the larger world to contemplate Boy George, Sir Elton John, and the like.

Yet, the brilliance of Dickens’ choice of names cannot be nay-said. One recalls the Canaanite warrior, Uriah, who married Bathsheba, who in turn found favor in the eye of King David. Although in the Biblical account, there was no reason to find blame in Uriah’s comportment of himself as a soldier fighting in King David’s army nor as a husband, he did come from the accursed line of Canaan, one of the lines of which was the Hittites. The Will of the Most High could hardly arrange for His promised Messiah to come through a geneology that included the bloodline of accursed Canaan. If David did not marry Bathsheba, King Solomon would not have been born. Incidentally, the name “Bathsheba” was probably originally “Bethshua,” having a meaning of “comes in the name of the House” or “the Salvation of the House” or “the House Saves.” At any rate I believe her name pointed toward The Savior, Yahshua.

The fact that David Copperfield bears the same first name is no accident in my view. The fact that Charles Dickens did not follow the Biblical story to the letter does not alter the fact that he found his warning upon this Israelite foundation. As King David prefigured the Messiah to a degree, it was only mete and just that Dickens named the hero of his story David, as well, for he saved the bloodline.

Now, it is a fact that Edom bears the bloodlines of accursed Canaan, through Esau’s marriages to Canaanite women initially, bringing much grief to the hearts of Isaac and Rebecca. Since it is perfectly reasonable to suppose that these women did not come alone, but that they brought along an entourage of Canaanites at the time of the betrothal. Further, over time they were probably joined by additionally Canaanite, who either wished to enjoy Edom’s prosperity or were fleeing danger from the hands of invading armies. At any rate the seedline of Edom became a mixed multitude over time. When the difficulties with the House of Israel and later the House of Judah ensued, the Edomites moved northward, eventually occupying a land known as “Idumea” ["Edom" in Greek]. Parenthetically, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart wrote an opera by that name. During the 2hd century B.C., the Edomites were subdued by John Hyrcanus, and they were forced to convert to Judaism. Thereafter, Edom was no more, and there were only the Jews. At the time of the Messiah, the king, Herod, and High Priest, Caiphas, and Chief priests (and probably the Temple Guard) were all Edomite Jews.

Therefore, the historical ancestry of the Jews of Jerusalem came to bear the bloodline of Esau-Canaan. The Sephardic Jews were especially likely to bear this bloodline. The colonies of Edom along the Silk Road probably eventually merged into that of the Babylonian Jews, who probably already absorbed some of the bloodlines of Amalek, after the Esther revenge caused scores of thousands of Babylonians and clandestine Amalekites to convert to Judaism. It is about this time in Babylon that Israelitish religious practices ended and rabbinic Talmudism began.

Therefore, Charles Dickens’ masterpiece both implied his understanding of England’s now powerful immigrant Jews’ lineage and the lineage of the British people, but also served as a prophesy of what the future holds for England, until a savior comes to restore the sheep to their pastures. Until such time, It is the Time of Jacob’s Trouble.

The other writer I wanted to discuss briefly is Hans Christian Anderson. As with Charles Dickens, he tried to provide warning to his readers of the folly of their leaders, Anderson was a Dane (Tribe of Dan). He created a collection of “children’s stories,” which were meant to provide educational messages to better arm children for adult life. One important story was the tale about “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In this story “two tailors” advised the king on his royal garments. One day they brought to his attention an especially magnificent robe. The king remarked on its unusual quality. The tailors commented on the extraordinary sheerness of the textiles employed–quite grand and suitable for the discriminating Royal Person. There was no robe its equal in all the world. When the king disrobed and donned the fancy new robe, which the tailors ably assisted him into, he commented on how light it was. Why, even a feather has more weight! And it was so fine that light easily pierces it–as if mere air. When the king asked his nobles present to comment on his new royal robe, none wanted to seem vulgar by stating that they saw none, so each extolled its beauty. At last, the king decided to walk through the streets so that his people could see his gorgeous robe. Crowds gathered to witness the extraordinary event. As the king walked, crowds of people stared–none made a sound, as none wanted to seem to be a fool. Finally, a tot cried out: “Look! The King wears no clothes!” Then all the commoners began to laugh, the king, embarrassed hurried back to his palace, and the tailors caught “the first train to LA.”

In the continent at the time of this story, “Court Jews” were numerous amongst the royal and aristocratic sites of political (and therefore monetary) power. They advised the kings, dukes, counts, barons, et al, on many matters. The also offered their services as spies and couriers. The latter allowed Jews to be privy to royal planning even before its intended target. They may have even introduced the use of “counterfeit nessages” to put a different and advantageous spin on things from the point of view of “connected” Jews. This process started slowly as money changers and financiers (providing royals opportunities to increase their wealth in coin through advantageous loans). The process was somewhat similar to that of modern dope dealers who went to parties and provided “free” cocaine or heroin to the weekend “chippers.” In time they had a lot of these same people knocking at their doors for “a hit.”

Needless to say, the royal and aristocratic crowd kept coming back for more. This automatically increased Jewish leverage to pray to the royal/aristocratic client for “some favor” (which often resulted in longterm Jewish advantages). The royals became deeper in debt. The wise advice of Jews might be to declare war on a wealthy neighbor. Not only did this offer the royal a means of replenishing depleted coffers, it also alowed Jews the opportunity of lending the funds needed to pay the soldiers, suppliers and armorers what was required for their services. As their equivalents might be advising the proposed adversary, it allowed these Jewish advisers to coordinate their advice to the great advantage of Jews. In time Jews also came to control some of the most important munitions companies, such as Vickers. Always advocates of free trade since their “heydays” in Petra, on the Silk Road with their colonies, and on their well-travelled, trading ships, the Edomite Jews knew just what precious trinket might please a given royal.

Well, if the royal & aristocratic crowd flourished, and if the Jews flourished, who was left holding the stick? Naturally, it was the general subject population who had to give the lion’s share of their labor to the royals, either in tax or some sort of feudal share-cropping. This same populous group was expected to provide the manpower in a war. The advisers in these matters were ever more importantly Jews.

Now, Anderson’s story of  “The Emperor’s New Clothes” is a gentle warning of the folly of having aliens, or strangers, counciling the king. They make fools of the king, and they mock and despoil the subjects. At this time in Europe few would fail to connect “the tailors” with “Jewish advisers,” as tailoring was a form of business which Jews especially populated.

In our time in the West, Jews appear at the moment ready to shed their role of “adviser” and assume the role of ruler directly. Many 20th century American presidents have been of Jewish extraction, including the present “Mad Bomber,” W. No matter what these presidents profess in terms of their “Christian” beliefs, the Jewish State and the Jewish World Agenda always have priority.

All rights reserved. Gobigfoot, 2008.